| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: Fish Tank Clan :: FT Community Clan |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| [Discussion] Article II of the Constitution | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| doctorphate |
|
||
doctorphate
Registered Member #724
Joined: Wed May 30 2007, 03:50AMPosts: 699 |
I agree. My first Nom failed and I took the criticism and worked on it so i could join. Then I made it in and there were no surprises. Now this is like 6 years back or some shit but still. Alco brings up an excellent point, blind vote removes the transparency of the clan and thats something that many people find attractive. I also think this should have went to a vote first. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| NoSkill |
|
||
Sir
Registered Member #457
Joined: Tue Oct 10 2006, 01:13PMPosts: 2628 |
Why don't we just do whatever the hell worked for like 10 years? I really don't see a need to change anything... Goddamn progressives. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Knightrider |
|
||
Meteor 2016
Registered Member #316
Joined: Mon Jun 26 2006, 09:14PMPosts: 3503 |
NoSkill wrote ... Why don't we just do whatever the hell worked for like 10 years? I really don't see a need to change anything... Goddamn progressives. A lot of shit was changed for this "new" constitution. I have a feeling that whenever you all voted on it, none of you actually read it. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| gLiTch |
|
||
Anal Assassin
Registered Member #455
Joined: Mon Oct 09 2006, 04:58AMPosts: 3848 |
[quote] I'm thinking the decision to end several years of transparency in clan activity should have been decided by the clan. This forum admin decision (to make all FTCC sub/forums private) was apparently made because nominees' feelings might possibly be hurt. Attention FT Feelings Police: now my feelings are hurt because you broke with tradition. Can the alcosatz Hurt Feelings Suffrage Movement begin now? What happens when a potential nomination fails, everyone goes apeshit in that discussion/voting thread (which is now private, yay!), but a later nomination passes for the same nominee? That former nominee who is now a member can see all of the hurtful things (like an FT member saying "I don't know this person" ! The drama!) Are you going to delete the failed vote to keep everything nice and tidy, so that no feelings are hurt? When did this become the goal of FT? When did we become such a sensitive bunch? If you want to keep discussion and voting separate then you need a two-stage system: -[link]- We could also talk about how important it is that FT is an elite force of officers and surfers who don't know each other. [/quote1345514933] Believe it or not... when i looked at the permissions for the forum/sub-forum, it was set to clan members only. I didnt like that and thought we always had transparency so i changed it. I changed it back because i thought that maybe i made a mistake and we didnt always have transparency. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| gLiTch |
|
||
|
Anal Assassin
Registered Member #455
Joined: Mon Oct 09 2006, 04:58AM Posts: 3848 |
NoSkill wrote ... Why don't we just do whatever the hell worked for like 10 years? I really don't see a need to change anything... Goddamn progressives. Noskill it is essentially the same constitution. Just a few tweaks. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|