| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: Fish Tank Clan :: FT Community Clan |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| Two-Stage Proposals | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| Madvillain |
|
||
Registered Member #445
Joined: Sun Oct 01 2006, 11:42PMPosts: 2233 |
well the reason that 3 days for both might pose a problem isn't because we cannot deliberate the issue in 3 days, but that some members might not see the thread within 2 or maybe all 3 days. A lot of people might only have 1 day to give there opinion which doesn't give them the proper discussion time needed. i say there be maybe a 5 or 6 day time period, however if people feel an issue has come to a close or overall agreement within 2 days, then the discussion part of the proposal should also come to a close as well. the time shouldn't be stressed, however some sort of limit must be set because arguments do get out of hand. Edited Tue Oct 30 2007, 03:49AM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| [FT](.)(.)'s a |
|
||
[FT](.)(.)\\\\(.)'s a](/media/avatar/100x0/upload/css_spray.1189739279.jpg)
Registered Member #355
Joined: Sun Jul 23 2006, 06:38AMPosts: 244 |
Madvillain wrote ... well the reason that 3 days for both might pose a problem isn't because we cannot deliberate the issue in 3 days, but that some members might not see the thread within 2 or maybe all 3 days. A lot of people might only have 1 day to give there opinion which doesn't give them the proper discussion time needed. i say there be maybe a 5 or 6 day time period, however if people feel an issue has come to a close or overall agreement within 2 days, then the discussion part of the proposal should also come to a close as well. the time shouldn't be stressed, however some sort of limit must be set because arguments do get out of hand. If they can't see it in 3 days they shouldn't be allowed to vote or discuss. If they missed 3 days of this forum or in game im pretty sure they can't have anything constructive to say about the situation. I don't post or login to often any more but I do check the forums everyday and always know whats going on, in and out of the game. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Wu-banga |
|
||
Registered Member #49
Joined: Tue Dec 06 2005, 01:37AMPosts: 1561 |
I actually never saw too much of a problem with the 2006 one, except when the occasional person forgot they made a nomination thread, and then never finished up the procedure. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Vincent Vega |
|
||
Registered Member #578
Joined: Fri Feb 23 2007, 07:00AMPosts: 176 |
If it must change, then I like titties idea; otherwise the system seems fine. Yes or No with a why or why not, but not an all out war on other voters. We're a clan, not a Congress 
|
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Evilpig |
|
||
01nk3d bY tEh P1g
Registered Member #531
Joined: Thu Jan 04 2007, 05:27AMPosts: 707 |
I think this is a good idea actually. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| AwsedreswA |
|
||
Registered Member #223
Joined: Wed Apr 26 2006, 10:53PMPosts: 126 |
To make the initiation of a vote legitimate, lets require a discussion thread to be started no less than 3 days prior to beginning a vote thread. This will give people a 3 day heads up that a vote is coming, but still keep the actual vote time locked at 6 days. Though I feel that the vote thread should be used to cast the vote, a person's right to speak should remain. If someone wants to sum their position, or provide one if they missed discussion, they should be free to do so. They should actually be encouraged to put forth their ideas. I think that a 3 day discussion requirement to initiate a vote is a good method of encouragement, bettering our clan's communication and thus our decision making. Should this motion come to pass, we should consider the possibility of accepting "mail-in ballots" of those that would like to vote during the discussion phase. Nice thread AP, I was for this when voting was reformed. Edited Tue Oct 30 2007, 09:26AM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| aborted fetus |
|
||
The All-Cum Diet
Registered Member #47
Joined: Mon Dec 05 2005, 04:55PMPosts: 1888 |
Who was the all-knowing, all-wise individual who took it upon himself to delete the open (and valid) Awse and Wild termination threads? Just curious who made that decision for the whole clan. Who's taking ownership for that? Edited Tue Oct 30 2007, 11:10AM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| alcosatz |
|
||
FT Classic Op
Registered Member #39
Joined: Fri Dec 02 2005, 10:30PMPosts: 1545 |
aborted fetus wrote ... Who was the all-knowing, all-wise individual who took it upon himself to delete the open (and valid) Awse and Wild termination threads? Just curious who made that decision for the whole clan. Who's taking ownership for that? I don't know. I also have no idea why you're asking here. Please do not hijack this thread. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| [FT] CaTPooP |
|
||
nightrider![[FT] CaTPooP](/media/avatar/100x0/upload/sketch2s.1145985608.jpg)
Registered Member #122
Joined: Sat Jan 07 2006, 09:16AMPosts: 202 |
i agree with tits. "yes" or "no" should suffice for the voting thread, and if it is a controversial member termination where tempers could possibly flare up, a discussion thread should be created. this would also eliminate the "hey wtf you cant vote in your own term proposal" "wait yes i can your an assmonkey" bullshit that was going on. counting votes would also be easier, that way we dont have to sift through pages of arguing and banter to tally votes |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| emerican |
|
||
Registered Member #164
Joined: Tue Mar 07 2006, 12:07PMPosts: 3146 |
[FT wrote ... (.)(.)'s a] My opinion: who wants to wait weeks for a vote or duscussion we need to get to the point of things instead of have a reality based FT clan, tv show style. Seriously we are smart enough to make a decision in 3to3. Any longer then that will make the process corny and lame. The reason it was gone before was because it took to long and became pointless after a few weeks of talking about something simple as hi and/or bye to the clan. If the discussion takes longer then 3 days then cool but it shouldn't be longer unless the situation makes it that way. Basically it should be on a case by case basis, but the overall rule should be 3 days for both. what tits said |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|