| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: Fish Tank Clan :: FT Community Clan |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| DISCUSSION: Ammendment to the Official Voting System | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| JapJap |
|
||
Sup son?
Registered Member #720
Joined: Fri May 25 2007, 01:09AMPosts: 1326 |
A month would be best. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Madvillain |
|
||
Registered Member #445
Joined: Sun Oct 01 2006, 11:42PMPosts: 2233 |
i feel like this would definitely drive people away. Nope to the 30, maybe yes to 21 |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| JapJap |
|
||
|
Sup son?
Registered Member #720
Joined: Fri May 25 2007, 01:09AM Posts: 1326 |
If they are intimidated or 'driven away' by 30 days...then they truly don't want to be in the clan. If they even have to redo the 30 days, there should be a reason why they have to wait that time anyways. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Ruskiy Soldat |
|
||
Registered Member #465
Joined: Tue Oct 17 2006, 10:00PMPosts: 1295 |
japa speaks the azn truth. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Vincent Vega |
|
||
Registered Member #578
Joined: Fri Feb 23 2007, 07:00AMPosts: 176 |
I gotta say 21 too..30 is wayyyy too hefty. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Pockyninja |
|
||
Ruler of all that is pocky
Registered Member #28
Joined: Mon Nov 28 2005, 11:17PMPosts: 704 |
Sounds good to me. One thing though I dont think canceled should be exempt. The reason behind this is say your apple bear proposal is looking like it is going down the tubes you could cancel it right before it ends and then make a new one the same day. I doubt it will happen but think of it as more of a precaution. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Omni |
|
||
terrible one
Registered Member #33
Joined: Tue Nov 29 2005, 11:50PMPosts: 1292 |
Japa wrote ... If they are intimidated or 'driven away' by 30 days...then they truly don't want to be in the clan. If they even have to redo the 30 days, there should be a reason why they have to wait that time anyways. ppl have issues handling commitment and a time table for how they can nom is a vicious restriction... especially b.c when a nom fails (from what i'e noticed) it has never been posted again in the intimidate future. Y? cus ppl are aware of the obvious resistance. That assumes it fails hard like 2 yes and 10 no. and even if it is close 6 yes 7 no then if you do post it again a few days later (which i point out it hasn't ) it is like a 'recount' the rule seems unnecessary to me. PPL SHOULD be able to tell when and when not to give a proposal another try immediately folling a completion. Note i am talking about failing. NOT if the prop PASSES. =\ i have not fully thought this through and am still sorting it our in my head. so dont take this fully to heart, merely spewing thoughts and tangents! |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| NoSkill |
|
||
Sir
Registered Member #457
Joined: Tue Oct 10 2006, 01:13PMPosts: 2628 |
No it's fine ive been asking myself if it's neccesary also... since we've never actually had a problem with it... Hmm... any other thoughts? Is it neccesary? |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| gLiTch |
|
||
Anal Assassin
Registered Member #455
Joined: Mon Oct 09 2006, 04:58AMPosts: 3848 |
NoSkill wrote ... No it's fine ive been asking myself if it's neccesary also... since we've never actually had a problem with it... Hmm... any other thoughts? Is it neccesary? Well, theres that saying, "If its not broken, don't fix it." Personally, i dont see anything wrong with it. I think it would be a good addition to the system. If it becomes a problem later on for any somewhat reason, then just make a proposal to delete it lol.. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Madvillain |
|
||
|
Registered Member #445
Joined: Sun Oct 01 2006, 11:42PM Posts: 2233 |
Omni gets feels me on this one. Is our voting system perfect? maybe maybe not but i don't think this will help Edited Tue Jul 08 2008, 07:42PM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|