| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: General Forums :: Server: Fish Tank Surf |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| CS:Go Surf Server (I need your input) | ||
|
Moderator(s): kremit, kd., .4ngryToasters, Rusty, nostie, Noname|Boom, Amped, Knightrider, scope_uk, gLiTch, Buddha, mdogg1108, JapJap
|
| Author | Post | ||
| bleek |
|
||
#woo
Registered Member #23
Joined: Fri Nov 25 2005, 11:39PMPosts: 665 |
Would you guys like to play Surf in CS:Go? I'm considering starting up a server but first I'd like to know if there would be much interest in it. I see the source surf server is empty a lot, but I figure that perhaps a good Surf Server on CS:GO would spark some traffic, especially since there are not a lot of surf servers running yet. So what do you say? If FT got a surf server, would you play on it? Yay, or nay? |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| emerican |
|
||
Registered Member #164
Joined: Tue Mar 07 2006, 12:07PMPosts: 3146 |
Hell fucking yes. I'll even chip in a few bucks a month if money is an issue | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| bleek |
|
||
|
#woo
Registered Member #23
Joined: Fri Nov 25 2005, 11:39PM Posts: 665 |
The websites I found for hosting servers are pretty cheap. I don't know if they are shitty or something. But most that I saw offer 18 slots for around 20 bucks monthly, which is cheap. But perhaps some of the server OPs can weigh in and say who they use as hosts, maybe paying more is necessary. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Rusty |
|
||
FTS Server Op
Registered Member #159
Joined: Wed Mar 01 2006, 06:33PMPosts: 2682 |
I haven't enjoyed the few times I surfed in GO. I was going to wait for better maps and more updates to start one. No way valve can ignore it's best "mod" since 1.6? They'll eventually make adjustments for surf to run a little more smoothly. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Knightrider |
|
||
Meteor 2016
Registered Member #316
Joined: Mon Jun 26 2006, 09:14PMPosts: 3503 |
bleek wrote ... The websites I found for hosting servers are pretty cheap. I don't know if they are shitty or something. But most that I saw offer 18 slots for around 20 bucks monthly, which is cheap. But perhaps some of the server OPs can weigh in and say who they use as hosts, maybe paying more is necessary. We use NFO. They're okay. Gameservers.com is garbage, don't go with them. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| emerican |
|
||
|
Registered Member #164
Joined: Tue Mar 07 2006, 12:07PM Posts: 3146 |
I used Gameservers, and I think that's what Knight and Alex use as well. They're pretty cheap, about a dollar a slot, and they have pretty decent customer service | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| bleek |
|
||
|
#woo
Registered Member #23
Joined: Fri Nov 25 2005, 11:39PM Posts: 665 |
Rusty wrote ... I haven't enjoyed the few times I surfed in GO. I was going to wait for better maps and more updates to start one. No way valve can ignore it's best "mod" since 1.6? They'll eventually make adjustments for surf to run a little more smoothly. Yeah, I played great river and skyworld. My only concern about waiting for Valve to fix this is that we lose the opportunity to build a base. People who are serious about surf already are looking for servers, even shitty ones. If they get used to playing somewhere and Valve comes out with updates they will most likely stick to the community they know. If we enter the scene to late, we will lose players. Knightrider wrote ... bleek wrote ... The websites I found for hosting servers are pretty cheap. I don't know if they are shitty or something. But most that I saw offer 18 slots for around 20 bucks monthly, which is cheap. But perhaps some of the server OPs can weigh in and say who they use as hosts, maybe paying more is necessary. We use NFO. They're okay. Gameservers.com is garbage, don't go with them. thanks, I'll check it out. Edited Fri Aug 31 2012, 05:53PM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Rusty |
|
||
|
FTS Server Op
Registered Member #159
Joined: Wed Mar 01 2006, 06:33PM Posts: 2682 |
Gameservers is crap, I'll agree with that. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| bleek |
|
||
|
#woo
Registered Member #23
Joined: Fri Nov 25 2005, 11:39PM Posts: 665 |
The price isn't much different. NFO looks good. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Rusty |
|
||
|
FTS Server Op
Registered Member #159
Joined: Wed Mar 01 2006, 06:33PM Posts: 2682 |
bleek wrote ... Rusty wrote ... I haven't enjoyed the few times I surfed in GO. I was going to wait for better maps and more updates to start one. No way valve can ignore it's best "mod" since 1.6? They'll eventually make adjustments for surf to run a little more smoothly. Yeah, I played great river and skyworld. My only concern about waiting for Valve to fix this is that we lose the opportunity to build a base. People who are serious about surf already are looking for servers, even shitty ones. If they get used to playing somewhere and Valve comes out with updates they will most likely stick to the community they know. If we enter the scene to late, we will lose players. Knightrider wrote ... bleek wrote ... The websites I found for hosting servers are pretty cheap. I don't know if they are shitty or something. But most that I saw offer 18 slots for around 20 bucks monthly, which is cheap. But perhaps some of the server OPs can weigh in and say who they use as hosts, maybe paying more is necessary. We use NFO. They're okay. Gameservers.com is garbage, don't go with them. thanks, I'll check it out. You know you'll have to go through the whole nomination and all the checks and balances to be affiliated with FT right? And considering the clan's "love" for surf, which is all talk and no action, I can't see it working out at the moment. Just a heads up. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|