| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: General Forums :: Schooling Fish |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| Obama>Hillary | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| Kcow |
|
||
Registered Member #643
Joined: Tue Apr 10 2007, 04:44PMPosts: 1921 |
Good thing I can't see you typing and I can only see what you wrote, thats why your post is fucking worthless. I do know shit about candidates and I am most likely more informed then you, thats why your post is fucking worthless. I know I can't vote but I can have opinions which is the first amendment, that is why your post is fucking worthless. You wear out the word fuck because you can't figure out any other words, that why your post is fucking worthless. I said "Come to my house and say that to my face" which is not fighting, which is why YOUR POST IS FUCKING WORTHLESS. Are you catching on? |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| NoSkill |
|
||
Sir
Registered Member #457
Joined: Tue Oct 10 2006, 01:13PMPosts: 2628 |
Kcow wrote ... Good thing I can't see you typing and I can only see what you wrote, thats why your post is fucking worthless. I do know shit about candidates and I am most likely more informed then you, thats why your post is fucking worthless. I know I can't vote but I can have opinions which is the first amendment, .... I had to stop there because I got confused. I'm no historian but after a Google search of this "first amendment" you speak of I found this: "Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." It seems like this first amendment thing prevents Congress from taking away freedom of... stuff from U.S. citizens. In a nutshell. What I don't get is what this... legal... preventive... protective... law has to do with you and your worthless opinion of the candidates... Here let's use an example but first, let's define worthless. worth·less - without worth; of no use, importance, or value; good-for-nothing Ok now, let's say that I have an OPINION about... oh I don't know... who the next president of Pakistan should be. Maybe I think Pervez Musharraf is a dildo and that... Carrot Top would make a much better president. That's fine... I'm legally (read above) entitled to my opinion. However, since I cannot legally vote for my preferred candidate (Carrot Top)... or do anything that would in any way affect the outcome of the presidential race in Pakistan. My opinion is therefore... without worth; of no use, importance, or value; good-for-nothing. Do you see now why your opinion is quote "worthless". I didn't say you weren't entitled to it, or that you shouldn't present it, because honestly, then what fun would I be able to have. All I'm saying... is that it was worthless. Thanks for playing though, we've got some lovely parting gifts for you. P.S. "Good thing I can't see you typing and I can only see what you wrote, thats why your post is fucking worthless. " Does this sentence mean anything to anyone? |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Rusty |
|
||
FTS Server Op
Registered Member #159
Joined: Wed Mar 01 2006, 06:33PMPosts: 2682 |
Not gonna lie, but voting for Ron Paul, a la your definition of worthless, is worthless. Let's leave it at that. McCain already has the republican nomination wrapped up, especially after Tuesday. Also, the next in line after him if Huckabee, then Paul. Shit, Being a republican at the moment is worthless since the candidate is already picked. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Kcow |
|
||
|
Registered Member #643
Joined: Tue Apr 10 2007, 04:44PM Posts: 1921 |
NoSkill wrote ... Are you catching on to the recurring theme here or do I need to type slower? Maybe that will point you in the right direction. Having and saying an opinion is FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Which you stated (Thanks) and I quote "Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech". Your argument about my opinion being worthless is pointless because any opinion is worthless (Thanks for the definition again) "worth·less - without worth; of no use, importance, or value; good-for-nothing". I don't see people selling opinions (Unless they are books or tv shows) so basically you said is common sense. My original post wasn't worthless, I stated that I didn't care for obama and that I would vote for Al Gore if I was the age to vote. But of course, I said your candidate was terrible so you had to make a huge personal fight about how my opinion didn't matter. I congratulate you for blowing a simple request to stop talking about Ron Paul into a huge cock fight about worth of opinions. I leave you with a consolation prize of a picture of minimal worth (worth·less - without worth; of no use, importance, or value; good-for-nothing) 
Edited Fri Feb 15 2008, 12:15AM
|
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Merzon |
|
||
Registered Member #981
Joined: Sun Feb 03 2008, 04:10AMPosts: 32 |
in response to the Buchanan topic.... James Buchanan, the fifteenth President of the United States -[link]- Edited Fri Feb 15 2008, 12:39AM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|