| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: General Forums :: Schooling Fish |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| If anyone is interested | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| Jesus[tzahal] |
|
||
![Jesus[tzahal]](/media/avatar/100x0/upload/mango_kiwi.1172003384.jpg)
Registered Member #530
Joined: Wed Jan 03 2007, 10:56PMPosts: 807 |
Pockyninja wrote ... By the way I said "in an argument", not "in this argument", but thanks for proving my point, I guess you were right here, QED.
Jesus[tzahal wrote ... ] For an English assignment? I suggest you uh... don't? And also, you can be right or wrong in an argument... sorry to bust your nuts Not in this one because nether side has enough evidence to prove that the other is wrong and nether side can prove that they are right. There for you can not be right and you can not be wrong. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| O_Mega |
|
||
Inconsistant Ownage Device
Registered Member #59
Joined: Sat Dec 10 2005, 06:12PMPosts: 1058 |
bananas disprove evolution. Havnt you seen the video? Then again bacteria proves it..... umm what your trying to do sounds almost like when I had to write a paper on the cause of obesiety for my extremely feminist teacher, and I said women caused obesiety... | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Czech Pride |
|
||
Registered Member #518
Joined: Wed Dec 27 2006, 01:15AMPosts: 911 |
All I can think of is this: The time span is so great that it is highly likely that some of the data is off. Most of the experiments are done in controlled environments and they might not have the same results as in nature. Therefore, we guess about how it happens in nature by applying the data that we gathered in controlled experiments. Basically, you can make an experiment go any way you want if you do it in a certain environment. I fully support the evolutionary theory, and I don't think that there is any scientific way to disprove it. Theories are only refined, the very rarely are completely scrapped, but I do enjoy a good debate so there is what I would say. Good Luck I remember when I tried to prove that mentally challenged people are not really human. According to the classification of a human, they are not! And, if we apply them to the classification of living organisms, we find out that they are not even that. They lack the ability to respond to their environment and to independently develop. This only applies to severely impaired people. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Pracket |
|
||
Registered Member #853
Joined: Wed Aug 29 2007, 07:01AMPosts: 377 |
Pockyninja wrote ... Jesus[tzahal wrote ... ] For an English assignment? I suggest you uh... don't? And also, you can be right or wrong in an argument... sorry to bust your nuts Not in this one because nether side has enough evidence to prove that the other is wrong and nether side can prove that they are right. There for you can not be right and you can not be wrong. I disagree with you. Just because something is not proven or the answer is allusive, that does not mean there is no correct answer. For example in this hypothetical situtation... Let's say the topic is, "why do farts smell?" Also in this hypothetical world, we do not know the reasons why it smells, therefor it cannot be proven or disproven with confidence. According to your logic, you could say "Farts smell because of semen leaking out of your vagina." Howver the correct answer is "XXX" Just because your claim cannot be disproven for what ever reason, does not mean it is the right answer. I just felt like breaking your balls  with pride.EDIT: Sorry if what I say doesnt make sense, a rant is a rant. Edited Fri Sep 28 2007, 04:22AM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Pockyninja |
|
||
Ruler of all that is pocky
Registered Member #28
Joined: Mon Nov 28 2005, 11:17PMPosts: 704 |
Pracket wrote ... Pockyninja wrote ... Jesus[tzahal wrote ... ] For an English assignment? I suggest you uh... don't? And also, you can be right or wrong in an argument... sorry to bust your nuts Not in this one because nether side has enough evidence to prove that the other is wrong and nether side can prove that they are right. There for you can not be right and you can not be wrong. I disagree with you. Just because something is not proven or the answer is allusive, that does not mean there is no correct answer. For example in this hypothetical situtation... Let's say the topic is, "why do farts smell?" Also in this hypothetical world, we do not know the reasons why it smells, therefor it cannot be proven or disproven with confidence. According to your logic, you could say "Farts smell because of semen leaking out of your vagina." Howver the correct answer is "XXX" Just because your claim cannot be disproven for what ever reason, does not mean it is the right answer. I just felt like breaking your balls with pride.EDIT: Sorry if what I say doesnt make sense, a rant is a rant. First of all we know why farts smell. It is methane gas coming out your anus. Also I never said it is the right answer I am saying you cant say it is the wrong answer because you have no basis for your statement. Third your scenario makes no sence. So since your statements makes no sense, is about something they could easily figure out, and doesn't prove that just because you don't know the answer you can disprove something. I would say you have established absolutely nothing. Sorry just had to break your balls. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Madvillain |
|
||
Registered Member #445
Joined: Sun Oct 01 2006, 11:42PMPosts: 2233 |
Pockyninja wrote ... Third your scenario makes no sence. lol. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Czech Pride |
|
||
|
Registered Member #518
Joined: Wed Dec 27 2006, 01:15AM Posts: 911 |
scents? | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| kevin |
|
||
AKA cupcake
Registered Member #374
Joined: Fri Aug 04 2006, 03:38AMPosts: 858 |
Just put this in there 1 page. report done, science is disproved by an animu grl.
|
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| nostie |
|
||
Registered Member #185
Joined: Thu Mar 30 2006, 10:42PMPosts: 3167 |
Buddha wrote ... Proven? no. Argued? sure.I have to go with pocky on this one. You cannot scientifically prove it wrong, because it is a theory. That is the point of a theory, it cannot be scientifically proven, or disproved. ask if you can use a pockyninja as an internet source. your teacher is sure to say yes. (lol). |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Knightrider |
|
||
Meteor 2016
Registered Member #316
Joined: Mon Jun 26 2006, 09:14PMPosts: 3503 |
Haha, that's if Pocky takes his time to type it
|
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|