| Fish Tank Clan :: Forums :: General Forums :: Schooling Fish |
|
« Previous topic | Next topic » |
| GayBomb | ||
| Author | Post | ||
| .4ngryToasters |
|
||
you would
Registered Member #149
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 01:08AMPosts: 2039 |
Listening to the Hillman morning show today on my way to work (the only way I get my news other than the Daily show with John Stewart), They started talking about how the BBC released information that the US military had beed working on a "gay bomb." That is to say a bomb that will release an aphrodesiac (bad spelling I know) that will make men irresistable to each other. So far the Military has put over 7 million dollars into research and hopes to use it as a non-leathal alternative to conventional weapons. Needless to say todays show was hillarious. Other strange weapons reported to be reseached was a "who me" bomb which would cause its victims to fart uncontrollably (but was abandoned due to the fact that 3rd world countries do not find the smell offensive because they live with the smell), and something else rather silly that I can't remember at the moment. Michelle (a skit character to make fun of the prisoner who wants a sex change on our tax dollars Mike = Michelle. He/she sounds uncannilly like Buffalo Bill from Silence of the Lambs, complete with that crazy theme music from that nasty scene we all wish we could forget) later commented about his/her gay bomb. It was one of the funniest shows I had ever listened to. Still, Hillman brought up a good point. Here we are trying to put a ban on gay marriage in the US, yet our millitary is researching a bomb that will make our enimies uncontrollably flamming. Good work with our tax dollars Bush, just another reason why your such a great president. |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Knightrider |
|
||
Meteor 2016
Registered Member #316
Joined: Mon Jun 26 2006, 09:14PMPosts: 3503 |
Hah yup, I think both Democrats and Republicans show no leadership these days. Thats why I dragged myself away from politics and pointless crap like that. But ask yourself though, could Kerry have done a better job? I think not. He'd be making a Ketsup bomb to drop on them, saying that they would be so into Heinz delicious flavor, that it would give us...time...to..make...hot dogs? ANY president into office could not avoid such mistakes made by BOTH George Bush and Clinton, if you didnt know, hes the cooch that got us into all of this crap that we are going through. Just give Bush the credit of not being the pansee that Kerry would have been, considering that he wants out of the war. Yeah, pulling out of the war would make it so that the countries that were our allies to HATE us, and thus, stooping us down to the level of PANSIES. Now I know how much people would like to see their family members back that happen to be BRAVELY fighting over in the war right now, I know, almost every one of my members fought in a war, and I plan to. Just thank Bush that hes not leaving that place, because then, those Sand Dwelling pricks are liable to attack us again. It wont happen again. | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| .4ngryToasters |
|
||
|
you would
Registered Member #149
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 01:08AM Posts: 2039 |
I'm not saying Kerry would be a better choice than Bush (and I'm not into politics either, I just hate it when people take my money then see that it goes into stupid shit like this, or see the people I know go to a foriegn country to fight someone elses battle). What really happened in the 2004 election was like being handed 2 bowls of shit, then voting on which one smelled less like shit. And I agree that action had to be taken to stop Terrorism, but what Bush has to realize is that in the world of terrorism, there will always be someone stronger and now more violent (because of the killing of his predassesor) to take the previous person's place. This means there is no way to effectively start a war against terror, especially if we are the only country fighting against it. What do you think will happen if we kill osama? Terrorist will just say "OK you win I quit,"? No they'll replace him (actually, if we use a gay bomb against him...). On a side note, I think you should check out the song by Ministry called Rio Grande The Blood. It's a cool song I found the other day about Bush. Edited Fri Jun 30 2006, 02:12PM |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Amped |
|
||
Hi
Registered Member #301
Joined: Thu Jun 15 2006, 01:55AMPosts: 888 |
The plans for the "gay bomb" were brought up in 1994. It was supposed to be a 6 year, $7.5 million project, but was never pursued. Source: -[link]- |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| Rusty |
|
||
FTS Server Op
Registered Member #159
Joined: Wed Mar 01 2006, 06:33PMPosts: 2682 |
Have you heard bush's new war? The war on porn. He is trying to get rid of all kinky porn, like bondage and shit. I put my money on him looseing that war! | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| .4ngryToasters |
|
||
|
you would
Registered Member #149
Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 01:08AM Posts: 2039 |
He's trying to distract everyone from all his screw ups is what he's doing | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| BuBBLe GooSe |
|
||
The Original MilfHunter
Registered Member #163
Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 02:24PMPosts: 1592 |
My response is three-fold...   |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
| DarkNarf |
|
||
Surf Owner/Operator
Registered Member #29
Joined: Tue Nov 29 2005, 01:47AMPosts: 409 |
riiiight..like i'm gunna belive there's a bomb that will make me gay. that fart bomb i can believe..but gay?? its not chemical people...its preference. if your horney as hell you'll either be fucking what you prefer or you'll be doing it yourself...not looking for the closest thing to fuck and just start fucking it...thats like some Hentai shit..... | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| BuBBLe GooSe |
|
||
|
The Original MilfHunter
Registered Member #163
Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 02:24PM Posts: 1592 |
It would be funny to see mass Bukkake all over the enemy,,,, I wouldn't be able to shoot stright given all the LOL ing! | ||
| Back to top |
|
||
| aborted fetus |
|
||
The All-Cum Diet
Registered Member #47
Joined: Mon Dec 05 2005, 04:55PMPosts: 1888 |
.4ngryToasters wrote ... Listening to the Hillman morning show today on my way to work (the only way I get my news other than the Daily show with John Stewart) I think this is sad, Toast. Though it is nothing more than my opinion, I think it is the duty of all citizens to be informed on what is going on. Remember, Toast, this is your government. You own the spy planes, and pay the “leaders’” salaries. The people are the ultimate “check and balance” in this country. Exercise your rights, flex your muscle, and let the powers that be know that it is you who is in charge, not them. You, Toast, own the government, not the politicians. Politicians work for you. They are your servants. Politicians are nothing more than glorified McDonald’s cashiers who do you a service. So, just as you would at McDonald’s, get angry when shit isn’t right. It is your right to get angry and, more importantly, it is your right to do something about it. Don’t let your employees (politicians) run you. You’re the boss. I know can be hard to stay informed (with the lack of independent media), but please try. Nightrider wrote ... Hah yup, I think both Democrats and Republicans show no leadership these days. Night, unfortunately, I couldn’t agree more. You are completely right. Neither party (nor any politician for that matter), truly has the common American’s best interests in mind. All politicians care about is getting reelected and continuing their reign. Lord Acton once wrote “Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely”. The more power our leaders get, the less in touch with the common Americans they become. Personally, I refuse to be loyal to a political party until there is a party that is loyal to the American people. Nightrider wrote ... That’s why I dragged myself away from politics and pointless crap like that. That pointless crap runs your life…literally. Do you not care who runs your life and how they do it? Nightrider wrote ... But ask yourself though, could Kerry have done a better job? I think not. He'd be making a Ketsup bomb to drop on them, saying that they would be so into Heinz delicious flavor, that it would give us...time...to..make...hot dogs? Could Kerry have done a better job? Well, no one will ever know. At best you can “guess” that “No, he wouldn’t have”. But that is nothing more than a guess. We will never know what kind of job Kerry would have done, but knowing for a fact Bush’s track record, I am sure that I was tired of seeing the same man making the same mistakes. Perhaps Kerry would have made the same mistakes, but one man making mistake after mistake for four years is better than the same man making mistake after mistake for eight years. Nightrider wrote ... ANY president into office could not avoid such mistakes made by BOTH George Bush and Clinton What are you referring to here? The Budget Well, Clinton left us with the largest surplus in U.S history. Bush left us with the largest deficit in U.S history. If you want to see a sad sight, check out a real time national debt clock here -[link]- Terrorism Well, Bush dealt with it. Clinton tried to deal with it, but the country and government was more concerned with where his penis had been. But, this is a problem that spans G.W Bush, Clinton, G.H.W Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy etc. This is a problem that has been boiling over for decades. In fact, Carter was one of the only Presidents who truly tried to fix things. Nightrider wrote ... Just give Bush the credit of not being the pansee that Kerry would have been, considering that he wants out of the war. Ok, let’s look at the facts to figure out who is the pansy. Kerry: served as a Lieutenant in the United States Navy during the Vietnam War from 1966 to 1970. He served two tours in Vietnam. Kerry was awarded several medals during his tours, including the Slilver Star, Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts. Sure, he may have been crtitical of the war after his service, but doesn’t he, above all, deserve to exercise that right. Doesn’t his word mean more, considering that he was there? Kerry was on the frontlines and served his country in battle. Bush: was a member of the Texas National Guard. Now, there are some differences between the Air National Guard then and now. Then, it was a way to get out of having to enter into combat on the frontlines, now the guard is a sure way to go to war. Today, many National Guard units have been mobilzed and sent to Iraq. In 1968, when Bush joined, that did not happen. There was a long waiting list to get into the Guard (as it was a way to get out of going to Vietnam), so, how did G.W Bush get in? Well, it helps when your daddy is a Texas state Representatve. Needless to say, G.W Bush got in and, unlike Kerry, never served one day in combat overseas. Yeah, right, the combat vetern, highly decorated Kerry is the pansy! Not the guy who managed to get out of putting his life in danger (Bush). Nightrider wrote ... Yeah, pulling out of the war would make it so that the countries that were our allies to HATE us, and thus, stooping us down to the level of PANSIES. Actually, going into the war was what made out allies hate us. If you remember an overwhelming majority of the world wanted us not to invade Iraq. That is why we have countries like Georgia and Lithuania as a part of the “Coalition of the Willing” Nightrider wrote ... Just thank Bush that hes not leaving that place, because then, those Sand Dwelling pricks are liable to attack us again. It wont happen again. Uh, Iraq never attacked us. Nor did they threaten us. Now I’m not saying Hussein was a good guy, but, he was not a threat to me or my country. .4ngryToasters wrote ... What really happened in the 2004 election was like being handed 2 bowls of shit, then voting on which one smelled less like shit. I couldn’t agree more. It’s unfortunate that the government only recognizes two parties in this country. We should have/need many more. .4ngryToasters wrote ... And I agree that action had to be taken to stop Terrorism, but what Bush has to realize is that in the world of terrorism, there will always be someone stronger and now more violent (because of the killing of his predassesor) to take the previous person's place. Agreed. We will never win the War on Terror. Never. This War on Terror is nothing more than an issue of the moment that politicians use to define their rule. Let’s take a look back at the other War on (Issue) that we’ve had in this country. 1.) Johnson – War on Poverty. Wow, great thing he declared that. Isn’t it nice that Johnson declared War on Poverty?! We won right? We don’t have Poverty any more! Yay! 2.) Reagan – War on Drugs. Wow, great thing he declared that. Isn’t it nice that Reagan declared War on Drugs?! We won right? We don’t have drugs anymore! Yay! 3.) G.W. Bush – War on Terrorism. Wow, great thing he declared that. Isn’t it nice that Bush declared War on Terrorism?! We will win right? We won’t have terrorism anymore! Yay! .4ngryToasters wrote ... What do you think will happen if we kill osama? Terrorist will just say "OK you win I quit,"? No they'll replace him Agreed, “terrorism” will never end. Remember, as colonists, we were once considered terrorists by the British. Not only did we defy the crown, we fought dishonorably. Rather than line up on the battlefield and shoot at each other, colonists used guerrilla warfare, snipers and hit and run parties to defeat our enemies. And we won. We, as Americans, consider Al Qaeda “terrorists”. Not only do they defy the U.S, they fight dishonorably. Rather than fight traditional battles and shoot with tanks, they use guerrilla warfare, roadside bombs and use hit and run parties to defeat us. …….. I will leave you with this quote. If nothing else, please think about it. "Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger." — Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II |
||
| Back to top |
|
||
Powered by e107 Forum System
|
|